Restorative Justice and the Criminal Justice System Essay

Mennonites and other practitioners in Ontario, Canada, and ulterior in Indiana, experimented with victim wrongdoer encounters that led to programs in these communities and later became models for programs throughout the world. revitalizing arbiter theory developed initially from these particular efforts (Zehr, 2002) . The restorative judge action originally began as an effort to rethink the needs which crimes create, as well as the roles implicit in crimes. recuperative justice advocates were concerned about needs that were not being met in the usual justice surgical operation (Zehr, 2002) .The abominable justice ashess approach to justice has some important strengths. Yet, there is in addition a growing acknowledgment of this systems limits and failures. Victims, offenders, and association members often feel that justice does not adequately meet their needs. Justice professionals, who make up the core components, such as resolve, lawyers, prosecutors, probation and paro le officers, and prison house staff frequently express a sense of frustration as well. Many feel that the process of justice deepens societal wounds and conflicts rather than contributing to healing or peace (Zehr, 2002) .Interdisciplinary study and research in public safety and restorative justice is very important. Restorative justice at this day in age will not replace the current court system, but it offers an alternative resolution benefit for people who want to try another approach. For example, some places be offering mediated victim and offender community conferences. These conferences provide facilitators to help victims and offenders seek reconciliation and resolution. Restorative justice seeks alternatives to continue to put more(prenominal) and more people in jail.Restorative justice seeks sentences that make amends to the victim of crime and to the community as a whole (Zehr, 2002) . Restorative Justice 3 My related feel of study is vicious justice. The criminal jus tice system is not a perfect system by far. The criminal justice system is concerned about holding offenders accountable, but that means making sure offenders get the penalization they deserve. The restorative justice approach focuses on the harm that has been done to people, one by one and as a community.Restorative justice recognizes that crime is wrong and should not occur and also recognizes that after it does, there are dangers and opportunities. Restorative justice has brought an awareness of the limits and negative byproducts of punishment. Beyond that, however, it has argued that punishment is not real accountability. Real accountability involves set about up to what one has done. It means encouraging offenders to understand the impact of their behavior, the harms they have done, and urging them to take steps to put things right as much as possible (Zehr, 2002) .Restorative justice and the criminal justice system are two systems that have different views. Restorative jus tice focuses on harm that has been done to people, individually and as a community. It recognizes that crime is wrong and should not occur, and also recognizes that after it does, there are dangers and opportunities (Kelly, 2001) . The criminal justice system has three core components, police, courts, and corrections. Each core component has a different fly the coop in the criminal justice system. The police functions are to enforce specific laws, investigate specific crimes, earch people, vicinities, buildings, get the picture or detain people. The police function is primarily a function of cities and states (Overview, 2008). The courts functions are broken refine into prosecutors, judges and magistrates. The prosecutors file charges or petitions for adjudication, seek indictments, drop cases and reduce charges. Restorative Justice 4 The judges and magistrates set bail or conditions for release, accept pleas, place delinquency, dismiss charges, impose sentences, and revoke prob ation (Overview, 2008). The corrections components are correctional officials and paroling authorities.Correction officials assign to type of correctional facility, award privileges, and punish for disciplinary infractions. The paroling authorities determine date and conditions of parole and revoke parole. Corrections are a primary function of the state and organization (Overview, 2008). Throughout the United States the criminal justice system is in a state of crisis. The public is grand and angry. Practitioners are weary and frustrated. Criminal justice policy is driven more by anecdote than self-opinionated information. Costs of current policies are not sustainable over long periods. Victims are often re-victimized in the process.